>NEW: Info to the keyword because | >discuss | >create link 
on Dec 25th 2001, 02:06:34, [das flederwiesel] wrote the following about

because

Why does there always have to be a 'because'? Probably because we always want an answer.
   user rating: +10
Can you think about the opposite of »because«? Write down how it works!
Your name:
Your Associativity to »because«:
Do NOT enter anything here:
Do NOT change this input field:
 Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »because« | FAQ | Home Page 
0.0028 (0.0012, 0.0003) sek. –– 165817316