| >NEW: Info to the keyword not | >discuss | >create link |
on May 6th 2003, 21:30:51, Topical68 wrote the following aboutnot |
|
To be, or not to be. In this case, apparently not to be. |
| user rating: +7 |
|
Do not try to answer or comment the text you see above. Nobody will see the things you refer to. Instead, write an atomic text about »not«! |
| Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »not« | FAQ | Home Page | |
| 0.0027 (0.0013, 0.0002) sek. 165351018 | |