>NEW: Info to the keyword 1st | >discuss | >create link 
on Apr 11th 2000, 21:28:19, ozgrrl wrote the following about


1st is highly overrated. I can't understand why people are so hung up on firsts – is it pioneering spirit, simple greed or aggressive competitiveness that prompts this need to be 1st at stuff?

Firsts are good for something, I suppose. Without firsts, there would be no seconds or subsequents, would there?

   user rating: +1
The Assoziations-Blaster is not like a chat or a discussion forum. Communication here is impossible. If you want to talk about a text or with an author, use the Blaster's forum.

Your name:
Your Associativity to »1st«:
Do NOT enter anything here:
Do NOT change this input field:
 Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »1st« | FAQ | Home Page 
0.0049 (0.0029, 0.0006) sek. –– 125285435