>NEW: Info to the keyword duty | >discuss | >create link 
on Jan 15th 2002, 17:47:41, whatevernext96 wrote the following about


A word to have trouble with, especially since dear Kant insisted on extending it into the even more fearful sounding sphere of the categorical imperative...So, here I am, having introduced a new keyword through a sense of duty – and now worrying whether my motivation for doing so was the morally correct one. Why can't we just have a bit more love, eh, Immanuel?! Uncomplicated, unconditional love.....

   user rating: +5
If »duty« is not at hand, what can one do? Write it down!

Your name:
Your Associativity to »duty«:
Do NOT enter anything here:
Do NOT change this input field:
 Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »duty« | FAQ | Home Page 
0.0033 (0.0012, 0.0007) sek. –– 113213930