| Amount of texts to »Law« |
34, and there are 34 texts (100.00%)
with a rating above the adjusted level
(-3) |
| Average lenght of texts
|
144 Characters |
| Average Rating |
1.265 points, 8 Not rated texts |
| First text |
on Apr 17th 2000, 18:54:30 wrote Justice_OConnor
about Law |
| Latest text |
on Nov 26th 2012, 23:58:32 wrote vty
about Law |
Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 8) |
on Jan 20th 2001, 00:40:24 wrote delta about Law
on Nov 26th 2012, 23:50:18 wrote vty about Law
on Mar 16th 2009, 20:34:04 wrote cocoa puff fairy about Law
|
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »Law«
Justice_OConnor wrote on Apr 17th 2000, 18:54:30 about
Law
Rating: 21 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
Law is inherently based on faith. One must have faith that the legislature has the power to make the law, the people and police will follow the law, the courts will honestly interpret the law. If this breaks down, you must have faith that society has enough at stake to continue to work for justice.
Ralph wrote on Nov 29th 2002, 02:49:45 about
Law
Rating: 3 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
The Law is just an Anagram of Wealth, Anne Clark says. But is this right or is this wrong? To the marxists, this should be true in a capitalist society. But I do not share the marxists´s point of view.
The Heretic wrote on Jul 28th 2000, 08:42:56 about
Law
Rating: 6 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
Law is not the ink or the paper it is written on, but the human concept of what is right. There is now way to escape law. It is omnipresent simply because it exists not as a tangible element but as an intangible concept.
dan b pearl wrote on May 8th 2000, 12:48:35 about
Law
Rating: 3 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
"[S]ome persons believe they have the power to
predict what has not yet come to pass; when such
persons impart their belief to others, they are
not acting fraudulently; they are expressing
opinions which, however dubious, are unquestionably protected by the Constitution."
California Supreme Court ruling, 1984
dan b pearl wrote on May 8th 2000, 13:07:34 about
Law
Rating: 1 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
»[T]he business of fortune-telling is inherently fraudulent... its regulation or prohibition is required to protect the gullible, superstitious or unwary.«
California Supreme Court ruling, 1976
»[S]ome persons believe they have the power to predict what has not yet come to pass; when such persons impart their belief to others, they are not acting fraudulently; they are expressing opinions which, however dubious, are unquestionably protected by the Constitution.«
California Supreme Court ruling, 1984
| Some random keywords |
fault
Created on Oct 8th 2000, 11:39:57 by Lying lynx, contains 13 texts
tropical
Created on Apr 30th 2004, 15:07:25 by agnes, contains 3 texts
front
Created on May 7th 2004, 08:42:34 by XIX, contains 3 texts
enjoy
Created on Jul 14th 2004, 11:31:27 by Bart Starr, contains 18 texts
WAIF
Created on Aug 4th 2001, 23:05:18 by JJ, contains 3 texts
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Marionetten
Created on Dec 16th 2001, 18:50:22 by Das Gift, contains 13 texts
DeadCanDance
Created on Jul 17th 2002, 20:09:13 by das Bing!, contains 10 texts
Skat
Created on Aug 28th 2000, 03:58:04 by Gronkor, contains 44 texts
Polizeischule
Created on Mar 2nd 2024, 12:57:37 by Geile Gerda, contains 6 texts
DeutschlandDeutschland
Created on Apr 22nd 2006, 14:43:37 by %, contains 10 texts
Soho
Created on Jun 1st 2003, 10:33:41 by FlowerPower, contains 6 texts
SozialdemokratischeGangstaRapper
Created on Sep 26th 2005, 21:28:51 by toschibar, contains 4 texts
|