matthew wrote on May 1st 2004, 10:05:44 about
astrology
Rating: 22 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
»What's your sign?« never worked for me.
I'm more of a »What's your favorite book?« kind of guy.
| Amount of texts to »astrology« | 16, and there are 14 texts (87.50%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
| Average lenght of texts | 159 Characters |
| Average Rating | 2.625 points, 1 Not rated texts |
| First text | on May 8th 2000, 12:55:24 wrote dan b pearl about astrology |
| Latest text | on Oct 23rd 2025, 21:45:23 wrote addressed Lord about astrology |
| Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 1) |
on Oct 23rd 2025, 21:45:23 wrote |
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »Astrology«
dan b pearl wrote on May 8th 2000, 12:55:24 about
astrology
Rating: 4 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
Bernard Williams (1973) depicts as »our standard situation«:
»our standard situation with regard to knowledge (in relation to other persons) is that of trying to find somebody who knows what we don't know; that is, to find somebody who is a source of reliable information about something.«
Discounting sceptics out for fresh bunk to debunk, those who open a book on astrology are, in accordance with Williams's description, those who:
(a) anticipate that the text will give a fair and accurate introduction to astrology
& (b) are interested in the »something« about which astrology promises to be a reliable source of information.
citron vert wrote on Apr 4th 2001, 20:06:36 about
astrology
Rating: 2 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
Q: How can you tell that there is an astrologer at a party?
A: She'll tell you.
the old pirate wrote on Mar 4th 2001, 20:23:52 about
astrology
Rating: 5 point(s) | Read and rate text individuallyAstrology was disregarded as a scientific principle over two thousand years ago, except by the Church and the feebleminded.
the old pirate wrote on Mar 11th 2001, 17:41:05 about
astrology
Rating: 3 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
The ancient astrologers themselves discounted astrology thousands of years ago, and replaced it something far more accurate: divining the future by rolling the knuckle bones of sheep, pigs and goats.
But this, too, lacked the accuracy they craved, so they found an even more precise method – viewing the entrails of a disemboweled chicken.
At last, they thought, at last we've found the ideal way.
| Some random keywords |
light-white
nihilism
Frodo
ObeyIslam
hypnagogic
|
| Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
boysahne
Sonderanfertigung
Original
Mutter
ÖPNV
Schnitzelwut
26062005
|