Amount of texts to »Law« |
34, and there are 34 texts (100.00%)
with a rating above the adjusted level
(-3) |
Average lenght of texts
|
144 Characters |
Average Rating |
1.265 points, 8 Not rated texts |
First text |
on Apr 17th 2000, 18:54:30 wrote Justice_OConnor
about Law |
Latest text |
on Nov 26th 2012, 23:58:32 wrote vty
about Law |
Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 8) |
on Nov 26th 2012, 23:50:18 wrote vty about Law
on Nov 26th 2012, 23:58:32 wrote vty about Law
on Apr 20th 2001, 15:24:07 wrote Joe about Law
|
Random associativity, rated above-average positively
Texts to »Law«
Justice_OConnor wrote on Apr 17th 2000, 18:54:30 about
Law
Rating: 21 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
Law is inherently based on faith. One must have faith that the legislature has the power to make the law, the people and police will follow the law, the courts will honestly interpret the law. If this breaks down, you must have faith that society has enough at stake to continue to work for justice.
Topical68 wrote on May 6th 2003, 20:53:27 about
Law
Rating: 6 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
What is the highest law? Self? Nature? God? Existence?
The Heretic wrote on Jul 28th 2000, 08:42:56 about
Law
Rating: 6 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
Law is not the ink or the paper it is written on, but the human concept of what is right. There is now way to escape law. It is omnipresent simply because it exists not as a tangible element but as an intangible concept.
dan b pearl wrote on May 8th 2000, 12:48:35 about
Law
Rating: 3 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
"[S]ome persons believe they have the power to
predict what has not yet come to pass; when such
persons impart their belief to others, they are
not acting fraudulently; they are expressing
opinions which, however dubious, are unquestionably protected by the Constitution."
California Supreme Court ruling, 1984
dan b pearl wrote on May 8th 2000, 13:07:34 about
Law
Rating: 1 point(s) |
Read and rate text individually
»[T]he business of fortune-telling is inherently fraudulent... its regulation or prohibition is required to protect the gullible, superstitious or unwary.«
California Supreme Court ruling, 1976
»[S]ome persons believe they have the power to predict what has not yet come to pass; when such persons impart their belief to others, they are not acting fraudulently; they are expressing opinions which, however dubious, are unquestionably protected by the Constitution.«
California Supreme Court ruling, 1984
Some random keywords |
doctrine
Created on Aug 17th 2004, 11:39:21 by Joe, contains 6 texts
ouroboros
Created on May 31st 2003, 20:10:05 by nOthing, contains 5 texts
consistency
Created on Feb 24th 2006, 23:06:12 by rkcba, contains 5 texts
reasonable
Created on Apr 19th 2000, 18:07:24 by SEWilco, contains 16 texts
tired
Created on May 16th 2000, 00:08:15 by GPhilipp, contains 19 texts
|
Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Mosambik
Created on Aug 14th 2002, 01:08:33 by Daniel Arnold, contains 8 texts
DerSagenumwobeneKelchderKotze146
Created on Jan 29th 2004, 15:32:27 by Orientierungskelch, contains 6 texts
ThomasHehde-für-alle
Created on Jan 23rd 2013, 14:54:50 by urgs, contains 5 texts
DerSagenumwobeneKelchDerKotze070
Created on Oct 4th 2002, 16:58:17 by Paranoiisierungspopper, contains 4 texts
|