>NEW: Info to the keyword datagarbage | >discuss | >create link 
on Sep 9th 2002, 04:40:34, Daniel Arnold wrote the following about

datagarbage

To me a glossary word is (been) missing with which one times without will think so correctly its muck can.
Therefore now thus »datagarbage«.

It must be said that it is heavy datagarbage to define. Because as soon as someone takes pin, paper or keyboard to the hand and writes a text, one must grant it/it at least the right not to abhor the text so long one it did not read.
Nevertheless here now thus the category datagarbage!
!»§$%&()=?`*'_:; In addition I tell you now that I was briefly already in such a way ( ) before it this category to introduce, when me mine despises «I you, I hates you abyss low, is you beknackt, a daily becomes actually total I you with an axe…"-computer – correct PC – a line by the calculation made and me from the Netscape navigator threw. Why also ever.;.jczj f and due to of up to the destruction going fight against everything which gropes angularly is andwhere PC isprintedon catch Igv now to you like # – datagarbage…-.#_Ae&/%mit to annoy erg.#_I know that is no matter to you, but as long as I mean reasonable data on you am at least to some extent to keep want, what lets me back-frighten before the axe, I spam you now and then with dastagarbage too also ifs you all the same am all the same around you then nevertheless again oh arghhtrhjdgflkjdhgfkloengblbaeoepoujkljuepooejklcbfoejkgflxd why sapiorusekrloejdnm, gf.whywhywhywhywhy4


[like if when a machine had having translated those]


   user rating: +1
Do you like or dislike »datagarbage«? Perhaps give arguments!

Your name:
Your Associativity to »datagarbage«:
Do NOT enter anything here:
Do NOT change this input field:
 Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »datagarbage« | FAQ | Home Page 
0.0112 (0.0083, 0.0017) sek. –– 128707233