chaos
Rating: 20 point(s) | Read and rate text individually
pwotwr9üco+eqsqß0ßx,0i´9PMOÖUIÜ=);MM=ÜU)ÄI;MM;ÜÖ(UZÖ;U;Ü=)>p)K;U;MP)ÜPR'E
Ö`'_;?=§ ;)?§`!§
`§$Q
=$§!
_
$§!_=_$§$%Ö
?CG"`CXG$
`$
?ÒÖCX*?=OCXOÖ_=?*?
;=)ÜY))F§Q=?$§=?$§=?9h82€}
Amount of texts to »chaos« | 66, and there are 61 texts (92.42%) with a rating above the adjusted level (-3) |
Average lenght of texts | 206 Characters |
Average Rating | 5.333 points, 5 Not rated texts |
First text | on Apr 12th 2000, 09:41:50 wrote hanz about chaos |
Latest text | on Dec 3rd 2014, 23:44:03 wrote copyriot about chaos |
Some texts that have not been rated at all
(overall: 5) |
on Jul 19th 2007, 11:03:59 wrote
on Jul 8th 2007, 04:29:24 wrote
on Mar 7th 2007, 04:16:34 wrote |
pwotwr9üco+eqsqß0ßx,0i´9PMOÖUIÜ=);MM=ÜU)ÄI;MM;ÜÖ(UZÖ;U;Ü=)>p)K;U;MP)ÜPR'E
Ö`'_;?=§ ;)?§`!§
`§$Q
=$§!
_
$§!_=_$§$%Ö
?CG"`CXG$
`$
?ÒÖCX*?=OCXOÖ_=?*?
;=)ÜY))F§Q=?$§=?$§=?9h82€}
Chaos theory, you know the one where someone says a butterfly flaps its wings in China and a Hurricane happens somewhere else?
Well I'll Explain it now:
Some scientist (whose name I don't remember) was working on one of the first weather simulations. He wanted to stop it, leave, come back, and restart it. So he wrote down all of the values of all the parameters in the simulation. He came back and re-entered all of the values. The simulation acted very differently than before. At first he was confused. Then he realized that he had rounded off the numbers. The difference between the acutally number, and the numbers he used was small, so small that it was compared to the effect of a butterfly flapping its wings and changing the air pressure.
Weather, and other systems, depend very heavily on current conditions, and small differences in current conditions will grow to huge differences over time. This is one reason why you should forgive your weather man if he is wrong about next weekend.
You may think that if we could just measure the conditions exactly we could predict the weather perfectly. If you think that, you are wrong. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle tells us that there is a limit to how exactly things can be measured. And even if we measured to the fundamental physical limit described by Heisenberg, those small errors would grow, and the weather predictions would only be accurate for a month or so.
So anyway, I basically said:
In some systems, like weather, small differences at one time grow to huge differences at a later time, and some people like to call this Chaos Theory.
Chaos is the field that underlies all things which exist.
In the beginning there was Chaos. Before the big bang all
order was bound into the monoblock, a point smaller than an
electron. All else was Chaos. After the big bang the
various dimensions of order were spontaneously created by
the inherent symmetry of the original matrix. These
dimensions continue to expand through the continuum, but
still the underlying Chaos remains active and potent
I disagree with the idea of chaos being the field that underlies all things, and that it was prior to the big bang theory. I think that whole collection of ideas is an escatalogical viewpoint and very culturally biased.
Perhpas chaos is more a balance to the idea of order...both being present in any structure and necessary for existence.
It has been said that systems tend toward chaos. However, abundant evidence shows systems constantly reaching upward toward order. No can look at a seed and say where the tree will have branches (chaos) , but the general shape of the mature tree will be easily recognized (order). Evolution creates higher levels of order in an attempt to become one with the original perfect order.
Chaos is only another word for the unresolved tensions that keep the world going round. We are pulled along by a black horse and a white horse (that's a sort of order) but the results of the tension between them is constant (causing a semblance of chaos), and if one horse ever becomes unhitched, the chariot falls over and all comes to an end.
So much for the Christian goal of a perfect world full of goodness and light.
chaos theory deals with, among other things, turbulence. fractals too. i'm drawing a blank here, half-remembering an old old cold-war joke about god and one of stalin's henchmen arguing over god's existence. god said something like, »who do you think created order out of the chaos?« and stalin's henchguy shot back, »who do you think created the chaos.«
i didn't get it then, and i probably mis-told it now.
I disagree with the idea of chaos being the field that underlies all things, and that it was prior to the big bang theory. I think that whole collection of ideas is an escatalogical viewpoint and very culturally biased.
Perhpas chaos is more a balance to the idea of order...both being present in any structure and necessary for existence.
The air displaced by the downward thrust of a butterfly's wings in Bejing affects the weather in New York.
Who decides what is order and what is chaos? Where does one end and the other begin, or vice versa? Would this endless puzzle matter, if only one were in the company of those (capital 'T' or not?) who knew exactly where the balance lay and never fell over the edge.....
If »chaos« is not at hand, what can one do? Write it down!
Very well spoken.
Visualize Chaos.
See it swirl around you.
a place with no vortex.
a system with no time.
a hand with no clock.
endless shifting
chaos is life's underlying order.
Some random keywords |
zeroes
palindrome
female-superiority
Nuclear
genius
|
Some random keywords in the german Blaster |
Heranwachsende
Arschhaut
Improvisieren
Pharmaindustrie
ZaZen
dasAlles
Nierenversagen
|